🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just the winner overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously went for the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. But no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.